Inverse monoids, regarded as algebras with a binary operation (the
semigroup multiplication), a unary operation (a ? a? ), and a nullary
operation with image 1, form a variety. Consequently, for any non-empty
set X, the free inverse monoid F IM(X) exists. Over 30 years ago,
Scheiblich and Munn provided a beautiful description of F IM(X); it is
proper, and as such can be represented as a McAlister P -semigroup P(G,
X , Y). In fact, G is the free group F G(X) on X and Y is a semilattice
of certain finite subsets of F G(X). We recall that a monoid is left
ample (formerly, left type A) if it is a sub-monoid of some symmetric
inverse monoid IX closed under the unary operation ? ? ?+ = Idom ? .
Right ample monoids are defined dually; a monoid is ample if it is both
left and right ample. (Left) ample monoids have abstract characterisations
using the generalisations R? and L? of Green's relations R and L; they
form quasi-varieties of algebras. As such, the free left ample monoid F
LAM(X) and free ample monoid F AM(X) exist. In the 80's Fountain
characterised F LAM(X); it is a submonoid of F IM(X).
Surprisingly,
ample monoids can be more awkward than left ample monoids. For example,
they have no nice representation theory as subalgebras of IX
corresponding to that in the one-sided case. Recently, the speaker,
together with Fountain and Gomes, has shown that F AM(X) is also a
submonoid of F IM(X). |